As North Carolina lawmakers prepare to override Gov. Josh Stein’s veto of a controversial energy bill, constituents are ...

A controversial bill to unravel North Carolina’s climate law would cost the state more than 50,000 jobs annually and cause ...

The bill also would have allowed Duke Energy to bill customers for the construction cost of plants that haven’t yet been built.

"Championing working families." Governor vetoes controversial bill that could have driven up energy costs: 'This bill fails ...

State regulators in Raleigh began testimony on Duke Energy’s request to build its plant on the same site as another one.

Constellation Energy , Duke Energy , Pacific Gas & Electric and all other operators of the country’s commercial nuclear power ...

The bill also makes law rules that allow Duke Energy to securitize 100% of the value of coal plants that are being retired, a step designed to help lower what ratepayers spend on retired power plants.

Duke Energy would be allowed to avoid a fast-approaching climate change goal and charge North Carolina customers now for future power plants under the terms of a bill on the way to Gov. Josh Stein.

North Carolina’s Senate Bill 266 would allow utilities to invest in nuclear power for the energy future of NC while keeping ratepayer bills ... Pillsbury Law has worked with Duke Energy in the past.