The House settlement has set the stage for revenue-sharing between universities and their athletes. Here's a look at what the settlement means moving forward.

The term has emerged as the most important part of the long-awaited legal settlement that will greatly reshape college sports, following its approval late last week. This is that House v. NCAA thing that’d been drip-dripping in the news forever, the Colleges Can Now Pay Their Athletes Actual Money thing.

The fund for past athletes will likely result in reduced NCAA payouts for member schools which Purdue estimates to be around a loss of $1.2 million per year for 10 years. Other than that, they want you to give more money. It’s really that simple.

Universities are facing big costs and hard choices about which sports benefit from revenue sharing and which are left behind.

A federal judge has approved terms of a sprawling $2.8 billion antitrust settlement that will upend the way college sports have been run for more than a century.

As the future of college athletics goes through a dramatic change, the University of Colorado is prepared to go all-in.

What’s in a (domain) name? Within an hour of Judge Claudia Wilken having granted final approval of the House v. NCAA settlement, the newly established College Sports Commission’s website went live, featuring a homepage headline declaring “a new day in college sports” beside a picture of female water polo players.