"I think the regulations cite that the reduction-in-force plans need to be clear and specific because employees can challenge those," said Michael Fallings.

Trump celebrated when the Supreme Court limited nationwide blocks on his policies, but judges are finding other ways to hinder his priorities.

President Droupadi Murmu has invoked the Supreme Court’s advisory jurisdiction to seek its opinion on whether binding ...

During the 2024-25 term, the court was unanimous 42% of the time in its Opinions of the Court. In the remaining 58% of such ...

A comprehensive analysis of lawsuits against Trump policies shows dozens of examples of defiance, delay and dishonesty, a ...

Today’s Court reprimands the Davids, not Goliath. To be fair, Justice Kavanaugh suggests in his concurrence that the proper fight belongs between two Goliaths – the President and the Supreme Court.

On 21 July 2025, the Court of Appeal delivered a significant ruling in AstraZeneca AB & Anor v Generics (UK) Limited & Ors, ...

"The 6-3 majority on the Supreme Court will decide what they want and then try to rationalize it," one First Amendment ...

Conflict has erupted in the ongoing water rights dispute between Nebraska and Colorado, prompting state leaders to escalate ...

The film, Heightened Scrutiny, follows Chase Strangio as he prepares to argue in favor of gender-affirming care access for ...

Punjab and Haryana HC’s Rule 5, held up by SC as a model, requires that a bail applicant disclose if they have filed a ...

A firing of Jerome Powell by President Trump would likely open up a legal war never before seen in the US, without any ...